Like, desire, plus the suppression off thoughts regarding close alternatives

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and Individual Conclusion, 29(2), 119�126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area away from accessory during the individual mating. Article on Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Log from Public Situations, 58(1), 49�74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal technical one minimizes societal involvement and you may emotional better-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.

The advantages of self-confident illusions: Idealization and construction from fulfillment from inside the romantic relationship

Kreider, R.M., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Number, time, and you can duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Most recent Populace Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L (2002). Cross-sectional studies from intimacy, passions, and you will commitment: Analysis the fresh assumptions of your own triangular theory out-of love. Psychological Account, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception better from the undertaking worse: Social contrasting inside romantic matchmaking. Log out of Character and you will Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80�95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Record regarding Identification and you will Social Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.

Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit cognition of romantic rivalry

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous selection: New developed mindset out-of relationship maintenance. Development and you can Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343�349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential investigation of dispute and agreement inside the distressed and you can nondistressed relationship partners. Record from Contacting and you can Clinical Therapy, 49(4), 554�567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Green, A great. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship creation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Record off Societal Items, 58(1), 9�30.

Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation objectives in the romantic relationships: A type of around the world improvement and you may specific verification. From inside the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents on study of few communication (pp. 32�58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-counselor bond from lens of attachment principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Lookup, Behavior, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest societal overseeing system: Increased awareness so you’re able to social signs since an adaptive reaction to personal exclusion. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new personal outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and you may intimidation (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Psychology Push.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Around the globe and you can certain relational models in the experience of public connections. Diary off Personality and you may Social Mindset, 80(4), 613�631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you can recommendations trying from inside the personal relationship. Identification and Public Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will specific attachment representations into the adulthood: Will there be a relationship?. Record Out of Public And personal Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001)mitment and you may dating fix components. In the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate dating: Maintenance and you will improvement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection actually perception one of partners since the a purpose of the latest resemblance in their common skills. Character And you can Societal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience out-of extrinsic rewards for the taste and you will loving. Journal regarding Identity and you will Social Psychology, 38(3), 453�460.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *